hack replace content with improper use of objectstore

This commit is contained in:
2024-04-29 11:55:11 +02:00
parent dfcb5dee97
commit eb2a19d8f3
3 changed files with 35 additions and 32 deletions

View File

@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
// solanaceae port of sha1 fts for NGCFT1
#include <solanaceae/object_store/object_store.hpp>
#include <solanaceae/contact/contact_model3.hpp>
#include <solanaceae/message3/registry_message_model.hpp>
#include <solanaceae/tox_contacts/tox_contact_model2.hpp>
@ -20,11 +21,9 @@
#include <mutex>
#include <list>
enum class Content : uint32_t {};
using ContentRegistry = entt::basic_registry<Content>;
using ContentHandle = entt::basic_handle<ContentRegistry>;
class SHA1_NGCFT1 : public RegistryMessageModelEventI, public NGCFT1EventI {
ObjectStore2& _os;
// TODO: backend abstraction
Contact3Registry& _cr;
RegistryMessageModel& _rmm;
NGCFT1& _nft;
@ -32,21 +31,18 @@ class SHA1_NGCFT1 : public RegistryMessageModelEventI, public NGCFT1EventI {
std::minstd_rand _rng {1337*11};
// registry per group?
ContentRegistry _contentr;
// limit this to each group?
entt::dense_map<SHA1Digest, ContentHandle> _info_to_content;
entt::dense_map<SHA1Digest, ObjectHandle> _info_to_content;
// sha1 chunk index
// TODO: optimize lookup
// TODO: multiple contents. hashes might be unique, but data is not
entt::dense_map<SHA1Digest, ContentHandle> _chunks;
entt::dense_map<SHA1Digest, ObjectHandle> _chunks;
// group_number, peer_number, content, chunk_hash, timer
std::deque<std::tuple<uint32_t, uint32_t, ContentHandle, SHA1Digest, float>> _queue_requested_chunk;
std::deque<std::tuple<uint32_t, uint32_t, ObjectHandle, SHA1Digest, float>> _queue_requested_chunk;
//void queueUpRequestInfo(uint32_t group_number, uint32_t peer_number, const SHA1Digest& hash);
void queueUpRequestChunk(uint32_t group_number, uint32_t peer_number, ContentHandle content, const SHA1Digest& hash);
void queueUpRequestChunk(uint32_t group_number, uint32_t peer_number, ObjectHandle content, const SHA1Digest& hash);
struct SendingTransfer {
struct Info {
@ -56,7 +52,7 @@ class SHA1_NGCFT1 : public RegistryMessageModelEventI, public NGCFT1EventI {
};
struct Chunk {
ContentHandle content;
ObjectHandle content;
size_t chunk_index; // <.< remove offset_into_file
//uint64_t offset_into_file;
// or data?
@ -72,14 +68,14 @@ class SHA1_NGCFT1 : public RegistryMessageModelEventI, public NGCFT1EventI {
struct ReceivingTransfer {
struct Info {
ContentHandle content;
ObjectHandle content;
// copy of info data
// too large?
std::vector<uint8_t> info_data;
};
struct Chunk {
ContentHandle content;
ObjectHandle content;
std::vector<size_t> chunk_indices;
// or data?
// if memmapped, this would be just a pointer
@ -93,8 +89,8 @@ class SHA1_NGCFT1 : public RegistryMessageModelEventI, public NGCFT1EventI {
entt::dense_map<uint64_t, entt::dense_map<uint8_t, ReceivingTransfer>> _receiving_transfers;
// makes request rotate around open content
std::deque<ContentHandle> _queue_content_want_info;
std::deque<ContentHandle> _queue_content_want_chunk;
std::deque<ObjectHandle> _queue_content_want_info;
std::deque<ObjectHandle> _queue_content_want_chunk;
std::atomic_bool _info_builder_dirty {false};
std::mutex _info_builder_queue_mutex;
@ -108,9 +104,9 @@ class SHA1_NGCFT1 : public RegistryMessageModelEventI, public NGCFT1EventI {
static uint64_t combineIds(const uint32_t group_number, const uint32_t peer_number);
void updateMessages(ContentHandle ce);
void updateMessages(ObjectHandle ce);
std::optional<std::pair<uint32_t, uint32_t>> selectPeerForRequest(ContentHandle ce);
std::optional<std::pair<uint32_t, uint32_t>> selectPeerForRequest(ObjectHandle ce);
public: // TODO: config
bool _udp_only {false};
@ -122,6 +118,7 @@ class SHA1_NGCFT1 : public RegistryMessageModelEventI, public NGCFT1EventI {
public:
SHA1_NGCFT1(
ObjectStore2& os,
Contact3Registry& cr,
RegistryMessageModel& rmm,
NGCFT1& nft,