tomato/docs/md/meta.md
Green Sky 5c7231b7a3 Squashed 'external/entt/entt/' content from commit fef92113
git-subtree-dir: external/entt/entt
git-subtree-split: fef921132cae7588213d0f9bcd2fb9c8ffd8b7fc
2023-07-25 11:29:51 +02:00

40 KiB

Crash Course: runtime reflection system

Table of Contents

Introduction

Reflection (or rather, its lack) is a trending topic in the C++ world and a tool that can unlock a lot of interesting features in the specific case of EnTT. I looked for a third-party library that met my needs on the subject, but I always came across some details that I didn't like: macros, being intrusive, too many allocations, and so on.
I finally decided to write a built-in, non-intrusive and macro-free runtime reflection system for EnTT. Maybe I didn't do better than others or maybe yes, time will tell me, but at least I can model this tool around the library to which it belongs and not the opposite.

Names and identifiers

The meta system doesn't force users to rely on the tools provided by the library when it comes to working with names and identifiers. It does this by offering an API that works with opaque identifiers that may or may not be generated by means of a hashed string.
This means that users can assign any type of identifier to the meta objects, as long as they're numeric. It doesn't matter if they're generated at runtime, at compile-time or with custom functions.

That being said, the examples in the following sections are all based on the hashed_string class as provided by this library. Therefore, where an identifier is required, it's likely that a user defined literal is used as follows:

auto factory = entt::meta<my_type>().type("reflected_type"_hs);

For what it's worth, this is completely equivalent to:

auto factory = entt::meta<my_type>().type(42u);

Obviously, human-readable identifiers are more convenient to use and highly recommended.

Reflection in a nutshell

Reflection always starts from real types (users cannot reflect imaginary types and it would not make much sense, we wouldn't be talking about reflection anymore).
To create a meta node, the library provides the meta function that accepts a type to reflect as a template parameter:

auto factory = entt::meta<my_type>();

The returned value is a factory object to use to continue building the meta type.

By default, a meta type is associated with the identifier returned by the runtime type identification system built-in in EnTT.
However, it's also possible to assign custom identifiers to meta types:

auto factory = entt::meta<my_type>().type("reflected_type"_hs);

Identifiers are important because users can retrieve meta types at runtime by searching for them by name other than by type.
On the other hand, there are cases in which users can be interested in adding features to a reflected type so that the reflection system can use it correctly under the hood, but they don't want to also make the type searchable. In this case, it's sufficient not to invoke type.

A factory is such that all its member functions return the factory itself or a decorated version of it. This object can be used to add the following:

  • Constructors. Actual constructors can be assigned to a reflected type by specifying their list of arguments. Free functions (namely, factories) can be used as well, as long as the return type is the expected one. From a client's point of view, nothing changes if a constructor is a free function or an actual constructor.
    Use the ctor member function for this purpose:

    entt::meta<my_type>().ctor<int, char>().ctor<&factory>();
    
  • Destructors. Free functions and member functions can be used as destructors of reflected types. The purpose is to give users the ability to free up resources that require special treatment before an object is actually destroyed.
    Use the dtor member function for this purpose:

    entt::meta<my_type>().dtor<&destroy>();
    

    A function should neither delete nor explicitly invoke the destructor of a given instance.

  • Data members. Both real data members of the underlying type and static and global variables, as well as constants of any kind, can be attached to a meta type. From the point of view of the client, all the variables associated with the reflected type will appear as if they were part of the type itself.
    Use the data member function for this purpose:

    entt::meta<my_type>()
        .data<&my_type::static_variable>("static"_hs)
        .data<&my_type::data_member>("member"_hs)
        .data<&global_variable>("global"_hs);
    

    The function requires as an argument the identifier to give to the meta data once created. Users can then access meta data at runtime by searching for them by name.
    Data members can also be defined by means of a setter and getter pair. Setters and getters can be either free functions, class members or a mix of them, as long as they respect the required signatures. This approach is also convenient to create a read-only variable from a non-const data member:

    entt::meta<my_type>().data<nullptr, &my_type::data_member>("member"_hs);
    

    Multiple setters are also supported by means of a value_list object:

    entt::meta<my_type>().data<entt::value_list<&from_int, &from_string>, &my_type::data_member>("member"_hs);
    

    Refer to the inline documentation for all the details.

  • Member functions. Both real member functions of the underlying type and free functions can be attached to a meta type. From the point of view of the client, all the functions associated with the reflected type will appear as if they were part of the type itself.
    Use the func member function for this purpose:

    entt::meta<my_type>()
        .func<&my_type::static_function>("static"_hs)
        .func<&my_type::member_function>("member"_hs)
        .func<&free_function>("free"_hs);
    

    The function requires as an argument the identifier to give to the meta function once created. Users can then access meta functions at runtime by searching for them by name.
    Overloading of meta functions is supported. Overloaded functions are resolved at runtime by the reflection system according to the types of the arguments.

  • Base classes. A base class is such that the underlying type is actually derived from it. In this case, the reflection system tracks the relationship and allows for implicit casts at runtime when required.
    Use the base member function for this purpose:

    entt::meta<derived_type>().base<base_type>();
    

    From now on, wherever a base_type is required, an instance of derived_type will also be accepted.

  • Conversion functions. Actual types can be converted, this is a fact. Just think of the relationship between a double and an int to see it. Similar to bases, conversion functions allow users to define conversions that will be implicitly performed by the reflection system when required.
    Use the conv member function for this purpose:

    entt::meta<double>().conv<int>();
    

That's all, everything users need to create meta types and enjoy the reflection system. At first glance it may not seem that much, but users usually learn to appreciate it over time.
Also, do not forget what these few lines hide under the hood: a built-in, non-intrusive and macro-free system for reflection in C++. Features that are definitely worth the price, at least for me.

Any to the rescue

The reflection system offers a kind of extended version of the entt::any class (see the core module for more details).
The purpose is to add some feature on top of those already present, so as to integrate it with the meta type system without having to duplicate the code.

The API is very similar to that of the any type. The class meta_any wraps many of the feature to infer a meta node, before forwarding some or all of the arguments to the underlying storage.
Among the few relevant differences, meta_any adds support for containers and pointer-like types (see the following sections for more details), while any does not.
Similar to any, this class can also be used to create aliases for unmanaged objects either with forward_as_meta or using the std::in_place_type<T &> disambiguation tag, as well as from an existing object by means of the as_ref member function. However, unlike any, meta_any treats an empty instance and one initialized with void differently:

entt::meta_any empty{};
entt::meta_any other{std::in_place_type<void>};

While any considers both as empty, meta_any treats objects initialized with void as if they were valid ones. This allows to differentiate between failed function calls and function calls that are successful but return nothing.
Finally, the member functions try_cast, cast and allow_cast are used to cast the underlying object to a given type (either a reference or a value type) or to convert a meta_any in such a way that a cast becomes viable for the resulting object. There is in fact no any_cast equivalent for meta_any.

Enjoy the runtime

Once the web of reflected types has been constructed, it's a matter of using it at runtime where required.
All this has the great merit that the reflection system stands in fact as a non-intrusive tool for the runtime, unlike the vast majority of the things offered by this library and closely linked to the compile-time.

To search for a reflected type there are a few options:

// direct access to a reflected type
auto by_type = entt::resolve<my_type>();

// look up a reflected type by identifier
auto by_id = entt::resolve("reflected_type"_hs);

// look up a reflected type by type info
auto by_type_id = entt::resolve(entt::type_id<my_type>());

There exists also an overload of the resolve function to use to iterate all the reflected types at once. It returns an iterable object that can be used in a range-for loop:

for(auto &&[id, type]: entt::resolve()) {
    // ...
}

In all cases, the returned value is an instance of meta_type (possibly with its id). This kind of objects offer an API to know their runtime identifiers, to iterate all the meta objects associated with them and even to build instances of the underlying type.
Refer to the inline documentation for all the details.

Meta data members and functions are accessed by name among the other things:

  • Meta data members:

    auto data = entt::resolve<my_type>().data("member"_hs);
    

    The returned type is meta_data and may be invalid if there is no meta data object associated with the given identifier.
    A meta data object offers an API to query the underlying type (for example, to know if it's a const or a static one), to get the meta type of the variable and to set or get the contained value.

  • Meta function members:

    auto func = entt::resolve<my_type>().func("member"_hs);
    

    The returned type is meta_func and may be invalid if there is no meta function object associated with the given identifier.
    A meta function object offers an API to query the underlying type (for example, to know if it's a const or a static function), to know the number of arguments, the meta return type and the meta types of the parameters. In addition, a meta function object can be used to invoke the underlying function and then get the return value in the form of a meta_any object.

All the meta objects thus obtained as well as the meta types can be explicitly converted to a boolean value to check if they are valid:

if(auto func = entt::resolve<my_type>().func("member"_hs); func) {
    // ...
}

Furthermore, all them (and a few more, like meta basis) are returned by a bunch of overloads that provide the caller with iterable ranges of top-level elements. As an example:

for(auto &&[id, type]: entt::resolve<my_type>().base()) {
    // ...
}

A meta type can also be used to construct actual instances of the underlying type.
In particular, the construct member function accepts a variable number of arguments and searches for a match. It then returns a meta_any object that may or may not be initialized, depending on whether a suitable constructor has been found or not.

There is no object that wraps the destructor of a meta type nor a destroy member function in its API. Destructors are invoked implicitly by meta_any behind the scenes and users have not to deal with them explicitly. Furthermore, they have no name, cannot be searched and wouldn't have member functions to expose anyway.
Similarly, conversion functions aren't directly accessible. They are used internally by meta_any and the meta objects when needed.

Meta types and meta objects in general contain much more than what is said: a plethora of functions in addition to those listed whose purposes and uses go unfortunately beyond the scope of this document.
I invite anyone interested in the subject to look at the code, experiment and read the inline documentation to get the best out of this powerful tool.

Container support

The runtime reflection system also supports containers of all types.
Moreover, containers doesn't necessarily mean those offered by the C++ standard library. In fact, user defined data structures can also work with the meta system in many cases.

To make a container be recognized as such by the meta system, users are required to provide specializations for either the meta_sequence_container_traits class or the meta_associative_container_traits class, according to the actual type of the container.
EnTT already exports the specializations for some common classes. In particular:

  • std::vector, std::array, std::deque and std::list (but not std::forward_list) are supported as sequence containers.

  • std::map, std::set and their unordered counterparts are supported as associative containers.

It's important to include the header file container.hpp to make these specializations available to the compiler when needed.
The same file also contains many examples for the users that are interested in making their own containers available to the meta system.

When a specialization of the meta_sequence_container_traits class exists, the meta system treats the wrapped type as a sequence container. In a similar way, a type is treated as an associative container if a specialization of the meta_associative_container_traits class is found for it.
Proxy objects are returned by dedicated members of the meta_any class. The following is a deliberately verbose example of how users can access a proxy object for a sequence container:

std::vector<int> vec{1, 2, 3};
entt::meta_any any = entt::forward_as_meta(vec);

if(any.type().is_sequence_container()) {
    if(auto view = any.as_sequence_container(); view) {
        // ...
    }
}

The method to use to get a proxy object for associative containers is as_associative_container instead.
It goes without saying that it's not necessary to perform a double check. Instead, it's sufficient to query the meta type or verify that the proxy object is valid. In fact, proxies are contextually convertible to bool to know if they are valid. For example, invalid proxies are returned when the wrapped object isn't a container.
In all cases, users aren't expected to reflect containers explicitly. It's sufficient to assign a container for which a specialization of the traits classes exists to a meta_any object to be able to get its proxy object.

The interface of the meta_sequence_container proxy object is the same for all types of sequence containers, although the available features differ from case to case. In particular:

  • The value_type member function returns the meta type of the elements.

  • The size member function returns the number of elements in the container as an unsigned integer value:

    const auto size = view.size();
    
  • The resize member function allows to resize the wrapped container and returns true in case of success:

    const bool ok = view.resize(3u);
    

    For example, it's not possible to resize fixed size containers.

  • The clear member function allows to clear the wrapped container and returns true in case of success:

    const bool ok = view.clear();
    

    For example, it's not possible to clear fixed size containers.

  • The begin and end member functions return opaque iterators that can be used to iterate the container directly:

    for(entt::meta_any element: view) {
        // ...
    }
    

    In all cases, given an underlying container of type C, the returned element contains an object of type C::value_type which therefore depends on the actual container.
    All meta iterators are input iterators and don't offer an indirection operator on purpose.

  • The insert member function can be used to add elements to the container. It accepts a meta iterator and the element to insert:

    auto last = view.end();
    // appends an integer to the container
    view.insert(last, 42);
    

    This function returns a meta iterator pointing to the inserted element and a boolean value to indicate whether the operation was successful or not. Note that a call to insert may silently fail in case of fixed size containers or whether the arguments aren't at least convertible to the required types.
    Since the meta iterators are contextually convertible to bool, users can rely on them to know if the operation has failed on the actual container or upstream, for example for an argument conversion problem.

  • The erase member function can be used to remove elements from the container. It accepts a meta iterator to the element to remove:

    auto first = view.begin();
    // removes the first element from the container
    view.erase(first);
    

    This function returns a meta iterator following the last removed element and a boolean value to indicate whether the operation was successful or not. Note that a call to erase may silently fail in case of fixed size containers.

  • The operator[] can be used to access elements in a container. It accepts a single argument, that is the position of the element to return:

    for(std::size_t pos{}, last = view.size(); pos < last; ++pos) {
        entt::meta_any value = view[pos];
        // ...
    }
    

    The function returns instances of meta_any that directly refer to the actual elements. Modifying the returned object will then directly modify the element inside the container.
    Depending on the underlying sequence container, this operation may not be as efficient. For example, in the case of an std::list, a positional access translates to a linear visit of the list itself (probably not what the user expects).

Similarly, also the interface of the meta_associative_container proxy object is the same for all types of associative containers. However, there are some differences in behavior in the case of key-only containers. In particular:

  • The key_only member function returns true if the wrapped container is a key-only one.

  • The key_type member function returns the meta type of the keys.

  • The mapped_type member function returns an invalid meta type for key-only containers and the meta type of the mapped values for all other types of containers.

  • The value_type member function returns the meta type of the elements.
    For example, it returns the meta type of int for std::set<int> while it returns the meta type of std::pair<const int, char> for std::map<int, char>.

  • The size member function returns the number of elements in the container as an unsigned integer value:

    const auto size = view.size();
    
  • The clear member function allows to clear the wrapped container and returns true in case of success:

    const bool ok = view.clear();
    
  • The begin and end member functions return opaque iterators that can be used to iterate the container directly:

    for(std::pair<entt::meta_any, entt::meta_any> element: view) {
        // ...
    }
    

    In all cases, given an underlying container of type C, the returned element is a key-value pair where the key has type C::key_type and the value has type C::mapped_type. Since key-only containers don't have a mapped type, their value is nothing more than an invalid meta_any object.
    All meta iterators are input iterators and don't offer an indirection operator on purpose.

    While the accessed key is usually constant in the associative containers and is therefore returned by copy, the value (if any) is wrapped by an instance of meta_any that directly refers to the actual element. Modifying it will then directly modify the element inside the container.

  • The insert member function can be used to add elements to the container. It accepts two arguments, respectively the key and the value to be inserted:

    auto last = view.end();
    // appends an integer to the container
    view.insert(last.handle(), 42, 'c');
    

    This function returns a boolean value to indicate whether the operation was successful or not. Note that a call to insert may fail when the arguments aren't at least convertible to the required types.

  • The erase member function can be used to remove elements from the container. It accepts a single argument, that is the key to be removed:

    view.erase(42);
    

    This function returns a boolean value to indicate whether the operation was successful or not. Note that a call to erase may fail when the argument isn't at least convertible to the required type.

  • The operator[] can be used to access elements in a container. It accepts a single argument, that is the key of the element to return:

    entt::meta_any value = view[42];
    

    The function returns instances of meta_any that directly refer to the actual elements. Modifying the returned object will then directly modify the element inside the container.

Container support is minimal but likely sufficient to satisfy all needs.

Pointer-like types

As with containers, it's also possible to communicate to the meta system which types to consider pointers. This will allow to dereference instances of meta_any, thus obtaining light references to the pointed objects that are also correctly associated with their meta types.
To make the meta system recognize a type as pointer-like, users can specialize the is_meta_pointer_like class. EnTT already exports the specializations for some common classes. In particular:

  • All types of raw pointers.
  • std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr.

It's important to include the header file pointer.hpp to make these specializations available to the compiler when needed.
The same file also contains many examples for the users that are interested in making their own pointer-like types available to the meta system.

When a type is recognized as a pointer-like one by the meta system, it's possible to dereference the instances of meta_any that contain these objects. The following is a deliberately verbose example to show how to use this feature:

int value = 42;
// meta type equivalent to that of int *
entt::meta_any any{&value};

if(any.type().is_pointer_like()) {
    // meta type equivalent to that of int
    if(entt::meta_any ref = *any; ref) {
        // ...
    }
}

Of course, it's not necessary to perform a double check. Instead, it's enough to query the meta type or verify that the returned object is valid. For example, invalid instances are returned when the wrapped object isn't a pointer-like type.
Note that dereferencing a pointer-like object returns an instance of meta_any which refers to the pointed object and allows users to modify it directly (unless the returned element is const, of course).

In general, dereferencing a pointer-like type boils down to a *ptr. However, EnTT also supports classes that don't offer an operator*. In particular:

  • It's possible to exploit a solution based on ADL lookup by offering a function (also a template one) named dereference_meta_pointer_like:

    template<typename Type>
    Type & dereference_meta_pointer_like(const custom_pointer_type<Type> &ptr) {
        return ptr.deref();
    }
    
  • When not in control of the type's namespace, it's possible to inject into the entt namespace a specialization of the adl_meta_pointer_like class template to bypass the adl lookup as a whole:

    template<typename Type>
    struct entt::adl_meta_pointer_like<custom_pointer_type<Type>> {
        static decltype(auto) dereference(const custom_pointer_type<Type> &ptr) {
            return ptr.deref();
        }
    };
    

In all other cases, that is, when dereferencing a pointer works as expected and regardless of the pointed type, no user intervention is required.

Template information

Meta types also provide a minimal set of information about the nature of the original type in case it's a class template.
By default, this works out of the box and requires no user action. However, it's important to include the header file template.hpp to make this information available to the compiler when needed.

Meta template information are easily found:

// this method returns true if the type is recognized as a class template specialization
if(auto type = entt::resolve<std::shared_ptr<my_type>>(); type.is_template_specialization()) {
    // meta type of the class template conveniently wrapped by entt::meta_class_template_tag
    auto class_type = type.template_type();

    // number of template arguments
    std::size_t arity = type.template_arity();

    // meta type of the i-th argument
    auto arg_type = type.template_arg(0u);
}

Typically, when template information for a type are required, what the library provides is sufficient. However, there are some cases where a user may want more details or a different set of information.
Consider the case of a class template that is meant to wrap function types:

template<typename>
struct function_type;

template<typename Ret, typename... Args>
struct function_type<Ret(Args...)> {};

In this case, rather than the function type, the user might want the return type and unpacked arguments as if they were different template parameters for the original class template.
To achieve this, users must enter the library internals and provide their own specialization for the class template entt::meta_template_traits, such as:

template<typename Ret, typename... Args>
struct entt::meta_template_traits<function_type<Ret(Args...)>> {
    using class_type = meta_class_template_tag<function_type>;
    using args_type = type_list<Ret, Args...>;
};

The reflection system doesn't verify the accuracy of the information nor infer a correspondence between real types and meta types.
Therefore, the specialization will be used as is and the information it contains will be associated with the appropriate type when required.

Automatic conversions

In C++, there are a number of conversions allowed between arithmetic types that make it convenient to work with this kind of data.
If this were to be translated into explicit registrations with the reflection system, it would result in a long series of instructions such as the following:

entt::meta<int>()
    .conv<bool>()
    .conv<char>()
    // ...
    .conv<double>();

Repeated for each type eligible to undergo this type of conversions. This is both error-prone and repetitive.
Similarly, the language allows users to silently convert unscoped enums to their underlying types and offers what it takes to do the same for scoped enums. It would result in the following if it were to be done explicitly:

entt::meta<my_enum>()
    .conv<std::underlying_type_t<my_enum>>();

Fortunately, all of this can also be avoided. EnTT offers implicit support for these types of conversions:

entt::meta_any any{42};
any.allow_cast<double>();
double value = any.cast<double>();

With no need for registration, the conversion takes place automatically under the hood. The same goes for a call to allow_cast involving a meta type:

entt::meta_type type = entt::resolve<int>();
entt::meta_any any{my_enum::a_value};
any.allow_cast(type);
int value = any.cast<int>();

This should make working with arithmetic types and scoped or unscoped enums as easy as it is in C++.
It's also worth noting that it's still possible to set up conversion functions manually and these will always be preferred over the automatic ones.

Implicitly generated default constructor

In many cases, it's useful to be able to create objects of default constructible types through the reflection system, while not having to explicitly register the meta type or the default constructor.
For example, in the case of primitive types like int or char, but not just them.

For this reason and only for default constructible types, default constructors are automatically defined and associated with their meta types, whether they are explicitly or implicitly generated.
Therefore, this is all is needed to construct an integer from its meta type:

entt::resolve<int>().construct();

Where the meta type can be for example the one returned from a meta container, useful for building keys without knowing or having to register the actual types.

In all cases, when users register default constructors, they are preferred both during searches and when the construct member function is invoked.

From void to any

Sometimes all a user has is an opaque pointer to an object of a known meta type. It would be handy in this case to be able to construct a meta_any object from them.
For this purpose, the meta_type class offers a from_void member function designed to convert an opaque pointer into a meta_any:

entt::meta_any any = entt::resolve(id).from_void(element);

It goes without saying that it's not possible to do a check on the actual type. Therefore, this call can be considered as a static cast with all the problems and undefined behaviors of the case following errors.
On the other hand, the ability to construct a meta_any from an opaque pointer opens the door to some pretty interesting uses that are worth exploring.

Policies: the more, the less

Policies are a kind of compile-time directives that can be used when registering reflection information.
Their purpose is to require slightly different behavior than the default in some specific cases. For example, when reading a given data member, its value is returned wrapped in a meta_any object which, by default, makes a copy of it. For large objects or if the caller wants to access the original instance, this behavior isn't desirable. Policies are there to offer a solution to this and other problems.

There are a few alternatives available at the moment:

  • The as-is policy, associated with the type entt::as_is_t.
    This is the default policy. In general, it should never be used explicitly, since it's implicitly selected if no other policy is specified.
    In this case, the return values of the functions as well as the properties exposed as data members are always returned by copy in a dedicated wrapper and therefore associated with their original meta types.

  • The as-void policy, associated with the type entt::as_void_t.
    Its purpose is to discard the return value of a meta object, whatever it is, thus making it appear as if its type were void:

    entt::meta<my_type>().func<&my_type::member_function, entt::as_void_t>("member"_hs);
    

    If the use with functions is obvious, it must be said that it's also possible to use this policy with constructors and data members. In the first case, the constructor will be invoked but the returned wrapper will actually be empty. In the second case, instead, the property will not be accessible for reading.

  • The as-ref and as-cref policies, associated with the types entt::as_ref_t and entt::as_cref_t.
    They allow to build wrappers that act as references to unmanaged objects. Accessing the object contained in the wrapper for which the reference was requested will make it possible to directly access the instance used to initialize the wrapper itself:

    entt::meta<my_type>().data<&my_type::data_member, entt::as_ref_t>("member"_hs);
    

    These policies work with constructors (for example, when objects are taken from an external container rather than created on demand), data members and functions in general.
    If on the one hand as_cref_t always forces the return type to be const, as_ref_t adapts to the constness of the passed object and to that of the return type if any.

Some uses are rather trivial, but it's useful to note that there are some less obvious corner cases that can in turn be solved with the use of policies.

Named constants and enums

A special mention should be made for constant values and enums. It wouldn't be necessary, but it will help distracted readers.

As mentioned, the data member function can be used to reflect constants of any type among the other things.
This allows users to create meta types for enums that will work exactly like any other meta type built from a class. Similarly, arithmetic types can be enriched with constants of special meaning where required.
Personally, I find it very useful not to export what is the difference between enums and classes in C++ directly in the space of the reflected types.

All the values thus exported will appear to users as if they were constant data members of the reflected types.

Exporting constant values or elements from an enum is as simple as ever:

entt::meta<my_enum>()
    .data<my_enum::a_value>("a_value"_hs)
    .data<my_enum::another_value>("another_value"_hs);

entt::meta<int>().data<2048>("max_int"_hs);

It goes without saying that accessing them is trivial as well. It's a matter of doing the following, as with any other data member of a meta type:

auto value = entt::resolve<my_enum>().data("a_value"_hs).get({}).cast<my_enum>();
auto max = entt::resolve<int>().data("max_int"_hs).get({}).cast<int>();

As a side note, remember that all this happens behind the scenes without any allocation because of the small object optimization performed by the meta_any class.

Properties and meta objects

Sometimes (for example, when it comes to creating an editor) it might be useful to attach properties to the meta objects created. Fortunately, this is possible for most of them.
For the meta objects that support properties, the member functions of the factory used for registering them will return an extended version of the factory itself. The latter can be used to attach properties to the last created meta object.
Apparently, it's more difficult to say than to do:

entt::meta<my_type>().type("reflected_type"_hs).prop("tooltip"_hs, "message");

Properties are always in the key/value form. The key is a numeric identifier, mostly similar to the identifier used to register meta objects. There are no restrictions on the type of the value instead, as long as it's movable.
Key only properties are also supported out of the box:

entt::meta<my_type>().type("reflected_type"_hs).prop(my_enum::key_only);

To attach multiple properties to a meta object, it's possible to invoke prop more than once.
It's also possible to invoke prop at different times, as long as the factory is reset to the meta object of interest.

The meta objects for which properties are supported are currently meta types, meta data and meta functions.
These types also offer a couple of member functions named prop to iterate all properties at once or to search a specific property by key:

// iterate all properties of a meta type
for(auto &&[id, prop]: entt::resolve<my_type>().prop()) {
    // ...
}

// search for a given property by name
auto prop = entt::resolve<my_type>().prop("tooltip"_hs);

Meta properties are objects having a fairly poor interface, all in all. They only provide the value member function to retrieve the contained value in the form of a meta_any object.

Unregister types

A type registered with the reflection system can also be unregistered. This means unregistering all its data members, member functions, conversion functions and so on. However, base classes aren't unregistered as well, since they don't necessarily depend on it.
Roughly speaking, unregistering a type means disconnecting all associated meta objects from it and making its identifier no longer available:

entt::meta_reset<my_type>();

It's also possible to reset types by their unique identifiers:

entt::meta_reset("my_type"_hs);

Finally, there exists a non-template overload of the meta_reset function that doesn't accept arguments and resets all meta types at once:

entt::meta_reset();

A type can be re-registered later with a completely different name and form.

Meta context

All meta types and their parts are created at runtime and stored in a default context. This can be reached via a service locator as:

auto &&context = entt::locator<entt::meta_context>::value_or();

By itself, a context is an opaque object that the user cannot do much with. However, users can replace an existing context with another at any time:

entt::meta_context other{};
auto &&context = entt::locator<entt::meta_context>::value_or();
std::swap(context, other);

This can be useful for testing purposes or to define multiple contexts with different meta objects to be used as appropriate.

If replacing the default context isn't enough, EnTT also offers the ability to use multiple and externally managed contexts with the runtime reflection system.
For example, to create new meta types within a context other than the default one, simply pass it as an argument to the meta call:

entt::meta_ctx context{};
auto factory = entt::meta<my_type>(context).type("reflected_type"_hs);

By doing so, the new meta type won't be available in the default context but will be usable by passing around the new context when needed, such as when creating a new meta_any object:

entt::meta_any any{context, std::in_place_type<my_type>};

Similarly, to search for meta types in a context other than the default one, it will be necessary to pass it to the resolve function:

entt::meta_type type = entt::resolve(context, "reflected_type"_hs)

More generally, when using externally managed contexts, it's always required to provide the system with the context to use, at least at the entry point.
For example, once the meta_type instant is obtained, it's no longer necessary to pass the context around as the meta type takes the information with it and eventually propagates it to all its parts.
On the other hand, it's necessary to instruct the library on where meta types are to be fetched when meta_anys and meta_handles are constructed, a factory created or a meta type resolved.